Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy C5's 76.4 overall score. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy C5, it is heavier and thicker. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy C5 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little greater pixel density.
Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy C5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.