Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 score. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is way newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 1920px resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy C7 Pro features greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.