Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a little bit better than Galaxy F23's global score of 84.6. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Galaxy F23 has Android 12. Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM.
The Galaxy F23 features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2408px resolution, a quite larger display and a just a little higher screen density. Motorola razr (2020) has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F23, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola razr (2020) shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.