Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy F41's global score of 85.2. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. Although the Motorola razr (2020) and Samsung Galaxy F41 were only released 0 months apart, the Motorola razr (2020) body is a little heavier but also somewhat thinner.
Galaxy F41 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit higher display density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite bigger display. The Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better performance than Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) features a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F41 takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy F41 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.