Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), with a general score of 88.1 against 87. The Galaxy F62 body is somewhat heavier and thicker than the Motorola razr (2020). These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has more processing cores (although slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy F62 features a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger display, a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy F62 has a greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.