Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s global score of 87. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy Fold design is somewhat thinner than Motorola razr (2020), although it is extremely heavier and was released about a year before.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Fold features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit lower pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because it has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than Motorola razr (2020), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.