Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | PLS |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M12's 80 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Galaxy M12 has Android 10. Even when Motorola razr (2020) and the Galaxy M12 were released only a few months apart, Motorola razr (2020) is thinner and lighter.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch of screen and a better 876 x 2142 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a 48 MP back-facing camera, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy M12 features a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.