Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s score of 87. The Galaxy M51 construction is somewhat thicker and a little heavier than the Motorola razr (2020). Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has 10 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Galaxy M51 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy M51 features a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.