Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is slightly better than Motorola razr (2020), with a 90.8 score against 87. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola razr (2020). The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit larger display, a little more pixels per inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2020). Both have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, better video frame rate and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Motorola razr (2020) has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Note 20 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.