Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Motorola razr (2020), with a score of 98.9 against 87. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone than the Motorola razr (2020). Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a better pixel density and a bit bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way larger sensor, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola razr (2020).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.