Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with an 87 score against 79.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The Motorola razr (2020) is a a lot newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy Note 5 features a more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola razr (2020) features a better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 5 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture, a way larger sensor and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy Note 5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Note 5. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some money and get the Galaxy Note 5, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.