Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 overall score. Motorola razr (2020) is a somewhat heavier phone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Motorola razr (2020) has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Note Fan Edition. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.