Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), having a overall score of 89 against 87. The Galaxy Note10 is a lighter device than the Motorola razr (2020), but they are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch of screen and a little larger display.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy Note10's memory for games and applications is just as good as the Motorola razr (2020) one, both have exactly the same internal storage. Motorola razr (2020) captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note10 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.