Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's overall score of 86.2. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should count with all the same operating system features. Motorola razr (2020) is a just a bit lighter and a little thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, even though they were released with only 8 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit greater screen density, a little bit bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better CPU than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola razr (2020) has a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a lot better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.