Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 score. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it's just a little bit thinner and incredibly newer. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Note3 counts with a screen that is just as good as the display in Motorola razr (2020), because although the Galaxy Note3 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little higher pixel density.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger aperture, a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality pictures.
Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a little better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.