Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Galaxy Note4, getting a score of 87 against 77.6. The Motorola razr (2020) design is much newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note4's, although it is a bit heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note4 features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note4 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 15 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola razr (2020) captures better photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much larger aperture, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.