Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Galaxy Note7, having a global score of 87 against 79.5. The Motorola razr (2020) construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy Note7, but it's heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.