Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | TFT |
| 373 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is much better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 score. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than the Galaxy On7 Prime, but it's heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime and Motorola razr (2020) feature very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little better pixel number per inch in the screen.
Motorola razr (2020) features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy On7 Prime counts with greater battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations, a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.