Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 score. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is just a little thicker but just a bit lighter than Motorola razr (2020), and they were only released 8 months apart. The Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola razr (2020). They have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.