Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), with an 89.1 score against 87. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE design has the same thickness than Motorola razr (2020), but it's somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy S21 FE features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S21 FE counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S21 FE is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.