Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Galaxy S24 FE, getting an 87 score against 76. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. Motorola razr (2020) is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy S24 FE, but they are equally thin.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a just a little greater display pixel density and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 7 more processing cores. The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a back camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) is way more expensive than Galaxy S24 FE, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.