Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a bit better than Galaxy S25's 82.6 overall score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S25 features a way better screen than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S25 also has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a little better count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior performance than Galaxy S25. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a little bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with a higher 50 MP resolution and a much better video quality.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S25, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S25. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S25, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.