Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020), with a global score of 90.7 against 87. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola razr (2020).
Motorola razr (2020) has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a greater pixel count in each inch in the screen and a bit larger screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega pixels camera. Galaxy S25 Ultra features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola razr (2020) one, both have equal 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.