Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's score of 80.9. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, giving a couple additional features and improved performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S6 Active has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra graphics co-processor. Galaxy S6 Active features improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a much larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S6 Active. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy S6 Active, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.