Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. Motorola razr (2020) is a much heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy S7, but both are 0.31inches thick. Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy S7 features a much sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater display pixel density. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S7 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy S7, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.