Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a score of 87 against 75.8. The Motorola razr (2020) is a newer and thinner device than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's also just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola razr (2020) features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot more MP camera in the back. The Galaxy S7 Active has a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.