Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S8's general score of 81.7. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than Galaxy S8, but it is heavier. The Galaxy S8 counts with a much better display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixels count per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processor than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S8 counts with a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S8. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S8, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.