Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, having a global score of 87 against 78.1. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is thinner but somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and both were released only 5 months apart.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger screen, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 876 x 2142px resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light images. Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover 5 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.