Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 87 score against 81. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is somewhat lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both were released with only 8 months difference.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola razr (2020) has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy XCover Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.