Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's general score of 85.6. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, we must tell that it is also an older, just a little bit heavier and thicker device. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) features a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs more money than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Z Flip 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.