Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is slightly better than Motorola razr (2020), having a general score of 94.6 against 87. Both devices in this review use the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is heavier but somewhat thinner than Motorola razr (2020), and both were released with only a couple of months difference.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a lot better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola razr (2020) feature very similar memory capacity for applications and games, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs more money than Motorola razr (2020), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.