Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 global score. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide you the same operating system features. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and thinner phone than Motorola razr (2020), although it's incredibly heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a much better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger display. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger aperture to capture better low light photography. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Motorola razr (2020), both of them have exactly the same internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 57% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.