Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2020), getting a score of 91.1 against 87. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is way thinner but somewhat heavier than the Motorola razr (2020). Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a way better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1968 x 2184 and a larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 256 GB more internal storage.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola razr (2020), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola razr (2020). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola razr (2020), giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.