Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Xperia XZs, getting a global score of 87 against 77.2. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZs, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. Sony Xperia XZs counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little bit better pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The Sony Xperia XZs captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images or videos in low light environments, a smaller back camera sensor, a back facing camera with a much lower resolution and a worse video resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xperia XZs has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 2900mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot more expensive than Xperia XZs, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.