Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), having a global score of 90.1 against 87. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is heavier and extremely thicker than Motorola razr (2020). These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Motorola razr (2020). Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates, a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has as much memory for games and applications as Motorola razr (2020), both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.