Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, having an 87 score against 81.4. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola razr (2020) is a newer phone than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, but it's a bit thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little greater pixels number per inch in the display. Motorola razr (2020) features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality, a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and the same resolution camera.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3070mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.