Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s global score of 87. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Motorola razr (2020). These phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 2800mAh. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.