Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a global score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 global score. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F4 has a newer 12 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11, offering some additional features and some performance improvements. The Xiaomi Poco F4 design is newer and a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Motorola razr (2020).
Xiaomi Poco F4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a much better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite larger display and a just a bit greater pixels count per display inch.
Xiaomi Poco F4 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.