Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 global score. Motorola razr (2020) is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even when they were released only a couple months apart. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little better display pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola razr (2020) has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution and a larger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.