Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a general score of 87 against 80.2. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides lots of additional features. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's just a little bit heavier.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit better display density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has slower video frame rate, they both have a camera in the back with a 48 MP, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.