Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), having a general score of 85.2 against 81.1. The Galaxy F41 body is just a bit lighter than Motorola razr (2022), but it's thicker and was released around a year before. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy F41 has older 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F41 has just a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
The Galaxy F41 has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much better battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.