Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Motorola razr (2022), with a 90.8 score against 81.1. The Galaxy Note 20 design is just a little bit lighter than the Motorola razr (2022), but it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. Motorola razr (2022) features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note 20. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20. Both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the same number of pixels per inch in the display and a screen with the same size. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as Motorola razr (2022), both have equal internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP and higher video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has better battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.