Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. The Motorola razr (2022) construction is notably newer and extremely thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's also just a bit heavier. Motorola razr (2022) has a better performing processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.