Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. The Motorola razr (2022) is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and a lot thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2022) has 12 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, offering some extra features.
Motorola razr (2022) has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola razr (2022) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.