Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, getting an 81.6 score against 73.1. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 2 features a way better processing power than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 2 captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a more MP back facing camera. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3640mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.