Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-21 |
| -- | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A12 has an overall score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's score of 73.1. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A12 has 10 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher pixel density, a little bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2640 pixels.
Galaxy A12 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A12, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a much better battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3640mAh. Samsung Galaxy A12 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.