Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| -- | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 426 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 global score. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra comes with Android 13 operating system. Galaxy A32 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2640, way more pixels per screen inch and a little bit larger display. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A32 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 37 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.