Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-20 |
| -- | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, getting an 82.3 score against 73.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A60 has older 11 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a quite worse screen pixel density and a quite smaller screen.
Galaxy A60 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. Galaxy A60 takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 16 MP resolution.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3640mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.