Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-27 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 Star has a score of 82.1, which is much better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's score of 73.1. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A8 Star has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a much greater processing power than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy A8 Star counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A8 Star takes greater pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a way better 16 MP resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has just a little better battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.