Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 global score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a just a little worse pixels amount per display inch and a little smaller display. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a little better battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3640mAh. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a way better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a much better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.